1 Real-Time group scheduling
2 --------------------------
12 2.1 System-wide settings
14 2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
21 Fiddling with these settings can result in an unstable system, the knobs are
22 root only and assumes root knows what he is doing.
26 * very small values in sched_rt_period_us can result in an unstable
27 system when the period is smaller than either the available hrtimer
28 resolution, or the time it takes to handle the budget refresh itself.
30 * very small values in sched_rt_runtime_us can result in an unstable
31 system when the runtime is so small the system has difficulty making
32 forward progress (NOTE: the migration thread and kstopmachine both
33 are real-time processes).
42 Realtime scheduling is all about determinism, a group has to be able to rely on
43 the amount of bandwidth (eg. CPU time) being constant. In order to schedule
44 multiple groups of realtime tasks, each group must be assigned a fixed portion
45 of the CPU time available. Without a minimum guarantee a realtime group can
46 obviously fall short. A fuzzy upper limit is of no use since it cannot be
47 relied upon. Which leaves us with just the single fixed portion.
52 CPU time is divided by means of specifying how much time can be spent running
53 in a given period. We allocate this "run time" for each realtime group which
54 the other realtime groups will not be permitted to use.
56 Any time not allocated to a realtime group will be used to run normal priority
57 tasks (SCHED_OTHER). Any allocated run time not used will also be picked up by
60 Let's consider an example: a frame fixed realtime renderer must deliver 25
61 frames a second, which yields a period of 0.04s per frame. Now say it will also
62 have to play some music and respond to input, leaving it with around 80% CPU
63 time dedicated for the graphics. We can then give this group a run time of 0.8
66 This way the graphics group will have a 0.04s period with a 0.032s run time
67 limit. Now if the audio thread needs to refill the DMA buffer every 0.005s, but
68 needs only about 3% CPU time to do so, it can do with a 0.03 * 0.005s =
69 0.00015s. So this group can be scheduled with a period of 0.005s and a run time
72 The remaining CPU time will be used for user input and other tasks. Because
73 realtime tasks have explicitly allocated the CPU time they need to perform
74 their tasks, buffer underruns in the graphics or audio can be eliminated.
76 NOTE: the above example is not fully implemented yet. We still
77 lack an EDF scheduler to make non-uniform periods usable.
84 2.1 System wide settings
85 ------------------------
87 The system wide settings are configured under the /proc virtual file system:
89 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us:
90 The scheduling period that is equivalent to 100% CPU bandwidth
92 /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us:
93 A global limit on how much time realtime scheduling may use. Even without
94 CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled, this will limit time reserved to realtime
95 processes. With CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED it signifies the total bandwidth
96 available to all realtime groups.
98 * Time is specified in us because the interface is s32. This gives an
99 operating range from 1us to about 35 minutes.
100 * sched_rt_period_us takes values from 1 to INT_MAX.
101 * sched_rt_runtime_us takes values from -1 to (INT_MAX - 1).
102 * A run time of -1 specifies runtime == period, ie. no limit.
105 2.2 Default behaviour
106 ---------------------
108 The default values for sched_rt_period_us (1000000 or 1s) and
109 sched_rt_runtime_us (950000 or 0.95s). This gives 0.05s to be used by
110 SCHED_OTHER (non-RT tasks). These defaults were chosen so that a run-away
111 realtime tasks will not lock up the machine but leave a little time to recover
112 it. By setting runtime to -1 you'd get the old behaviour back.
114 By default all bandwidth is assigned to the root group and new groups get the
115 period from /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us and a run time of 0. If you
116 want to assign bandwidth to another group, reduce the root group's bandwidth
117 and assign some or all of the difference to another group.
119 Realtime group scheduling means you have to assign a portion of total CPU
120 bandwidth to the group before it will accept realtime tasks. Therefore you will
121 not be able to run realtime tasks as any user other than root until you have
122 done that, even if the user has the rights to run processes with realtime
126 2.3 Basis for grouping tasks
127 ----------------------------
129 Enabling CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED lets you explicitly allocate real
130 CPU bandwidth to task groups.
132 This uses the cgroup virtual file system and "<cgroup>/cpu.rt_runtime_us"
133 to control the CPU time reserved for each control group.
135 For more information on working with control groups, you should read
136 Documentation/cgroup-v1/cgroups.txt as well.
138 Group settings are checked against the following limits in order to keep the
139 configuration schedulable:
141 \Sum_{i} runtime_{i} / global_period <= global_runtime / global_period
143 For now, this can be simplified to just the following (but see Future plans):
145 \Sum_{i} runtime_{i} <= global_runtime
151 There is work in progress to make the scheduling period for each group
152 ("<cgroup>/cpu.rt_period_us") configurable as well.
154 The constraint on the period is that a subgroup must have a smaller or
155 equal period to its parent. But realistically its not very useful _yet_
156 as its prone to starvation without deadline scheduling.
158 Consider two sibling groups A and B; both have 50% bandwidth, but A's
159 period is twice the length of B's.
161 * group A: period=100000us, runtime=10000us
162 - this runs for 0.01s once every 0.1s
164 * group B: period= 50000us, runtime=10000us
165 - this runs for 0.01s twice every 0.1s (or once every 0.05 sec).
167 This means that currently a while (1) loop in A will run for the full period of
168 B and can starve B's tasks (assuming they are of lower priority) for a whole
171 The next project will be SCHED_EDF (Earliest Deadline First scheduling) to bring
172 full deadline scheduling to the linux kernel. Deadline scheduling the above
173 groups and treating end of the period as a deadline will ensure that they both
174 get their allocated time.
176 Implementing SCHED_EDF might take a while to complete. Priority Inheritance is
177 the biggest challenge as the current linux PI infrastructure is geared towards
178 the limited static priority levels 0-99. With deadline scheduling you need to
179 do deadline inheritance (since priority is inversely proportional to the
180 deadline delta (deadline - now)).
182 This means the whole PI machinery will have to be reworked - and that is one of
183 the most complex pieces of code we have.