+
+ /*
+ * 1 of the following 2 things have happened so far
+ *
+ * 1) We found an ideal block group for caching that
+ * is mostly full and will cache quickly, so we might
+ * as well wait for it.
+ *
+ * 2) We searched for cached only and we didn't find
+ * anything, and we didn't start any caching kthreads
+ * either, so chances are we will loop through and
+ * start a couple caching kthreads, and then come back
+ * around and just wait for them. This will be slower
+ * because we will have 2 caching kthreads reading at
+ * the same time when we could have just started one
+ * and waited for it to get far enough to give us an
+ * allocation, so go ahead and go to the wait caching
+ * loop.
+ */
+ loop = LOOP_CACHING_WAIT;
+ search_start = ideal_cache_offset;
+ ideal_cache_percent = 0;
+ goto ideal_cache;
+ } else if (loop == LOOP_FIND_IDEAL) {
+ /*
+ * Didn't find a uncached bg, wait on anything we find
+ * next.
+ */
+ loop = LOOP_CACHING_WAIT;
+ goto search;
+ }
+
+ if (loop < LOOP_CACHING_WAIT) {
+ loop++;
+ goto search;