return rc;
}
+struct tis_vendor_timeout_override {
+ u32 did_vid;
+ unsigned long timeout_us[4];
+};
+
+static const struct tis_vendor_timeout_override vendor_timeout_overrides[] = {
+ /* Atmel 3204 */
+ { 0x32041114, { (TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT*1000), (TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT*1000),
+ (TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT*1000), (TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT*1000) } },
+};
+
+static bool tpm_tis_update_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *chip,
+ unsigned long *timeout_cap)
+{
+ int i;
+ u32 did_vid;
+
+ did_vid = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_DID_VID(0));
+
+ for (i = 0; i != ARRAY_SIZE(vendor_timeout_overrides); i++) {
+ if (vendor_timeout_overrides[i].did_vid != did_vid)
+ continue;
+ memcpy(timeout_cap, vendor_timeout_overrides[i].timeout_us,
+ sizeof(vendor_timeout_overrides[i].timeout_us));
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Early probing for iTPM with STS_DATA_EXPECT flaw.
* Try sending command without itpm flag set and if that
.recv = tpm_tis_recv,
.send = tpm_tis_send,
.cancel = tpm_tis_ready,
+ .update_timeouts = tpm_tis_update_timeouts,
.req_complete_mask = TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
.req_complete_val = TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
.req_canceled = tpm_tis_req_canceled,