]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commit
vlan: adjust vlan_set_encap_proto() for its callers
authorCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:32:27 +0000 (23:32 +0000)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:38:41 +0000 (05:38 -0800)
commit322e31f2d47198dfd0f4e2b880cd1fbfa7a2931f
tree588a02ac359907d3ea730e296d3c85d005ee660d
parent7bd46285b2bc213bb124a1ce995793a5788e3b36
vlan: adjust vlan_set_encap_proto() for its callers

[ Upstream commit da8c87241c26aac81a64c7e4d21d438a33018f4e ]

There are two places to call vlan_set_encap_proto():
vlan_untag() and __pop_vlan_tci().

vlan_untag() assumes skb->data points after mac addr, otherwise
the following code

        vhdr = (struct vlan_hdr *) skb->data;
        vlan_tci = ntohs(vhdr->h_vlan_TCI);
        __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag(skb, vlan_tci);

        skb_pull_rcsum(skb, VLAN_HLEN);

won't be correct. But __pop_vlan_tci() assumes points _before_
mac addr.

In vlan_set_encap_proto(), it looks for some magic L2 value
after mac addr:

        rawp = skb->data;
        if (*(unsigned short *) rawp == 0xFFFF)
...

Therefore __pop_vlan_tci() is obviously wrong.

A quick fix is avoiding using skb->data in vlan_set_encap_proto(),
use 'vhdr+1' is always correct in both cases.

Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Acked-by: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
include/linux/if_vlan.h