xen/pci: Use the INT_SRC_OVR IRQ (instead of GSI) to preset the ACPI SCI IRQ.

xen/pci: Use the INT_SRC_OVR IRQ (instead of GSI) to preset the ACPI SCI IRQ.

commit 155a16f21923bc2f04161ac92acca986371ef27b upstream.

In the past we would use the GSI value to preset the ACPI SCI
IRQ which worked great as GSI == IRQ:

ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)

While that is most often seen, there are some oddities:

ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 20 low level)

which means that GSI 20 (or pin 20) is to be overriden for IRQ 9.
Our code that presets the interrupt for ACPI SCI however would
use the GSI 20 instead of IRQ 9 ending up with:

xen: sci override: global_irq=20 trigger=0 polarity=1
xen: registering gsi 20 triggering 0 polarity 1
xen: --> pirq=20 -> irq=20
xen: acpi sci 20
.. snip..
calling  acpi_init+0x0/0xbc @ 1
ACPI: SCI (IRQ9) allocation failed
ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_ACQUIRED, Unable to install System Control Interrupt handler (20110413/evevent-119)
ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter

as the ACPI interpreter made a call to 'acpi_gsi_to_irq' which got nine.
It used that value to request an IRQ (request_irq) and since that was not
present it failed.

The fix is to recognize that for interrupts that are overriden (in our
case we only care about the ACPI SCI) we should use the IRQ number
to present the IRQ instead of the using GSI. End result is that we get:

xen: sci override: global_irq=20 trigger=0 polarity=1
xen: registering gsi 20 triggering 0 polarity 1
xen: --> pirq=20 -> irq=9 (gsi=9)
xen: acpi sci 9

which fixes the ACPI interpreter failing on startup.

Reported-by: Liwei <xieliwei@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Liwei <xieliwei@gmail.com>
[http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-06/msg01727.html]
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>