]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commit
h8300: select generic atomic64_t support
authorFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Thu, 25 Oct 2012 01:14:43 +0000 (12:14 +1100)
committerStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:49:42 +0000 (16:49 +1100)
commit6faeefc067bc75fcb6c79c0547ac963a8d51a253
treea1041fbe85cd8f98737e9d9e9e99b50882773443
parent2c91bdeec61cd1a75e66fe17440174184ff23c70
h8300: select generic atomic64_t support

Rationales from Eric:

So I just looked a little deeper and it appears architectures that do
not support atomic64_t are broken.

The generic atomic64 support came in 2009 to support the perf subsystem
with the expectation that all architectures would implement atomic64
support.

Furthermore upon inspection of the kernel atomic64_t is used in a fair
number of places beyond the performance counters:

block/blk-cgroup.c
drivers/acpi/apei/
drivers/block/rbd.c
drivers/crypto/nx/nx.h
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/
drivers/staging/octeon/
fs/xfs/
include/linux/perf_event.h
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.h
kernel/events/
kernel/trace/
net/mac80211/key.h
net/rds/

The block control group, infiniband, xfs, crypto, 802.11, netfilter.
Nothing quite so fundamental as fs/namespace.c but definitely in
multiplatform-code that should work, and is already broken on those
architecutres.

Looking at the implementation of atomic64_add_return in lib/atomic64.c the
code looks as efficient as these kinds of things get.

Which leads me to the conclusion that we need atomic64 support on all
architectures.

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arch/h8300/Kconfig