xfs: fix bmv_count confusion w/ shared extents

xfs: fix bmv_count confusion w/ shared extents

In a bmapx call, bmv_count is the total size of the array, including the
zeroth element that userspace uses to supply the search key.  The output
array starts at offset 1 so that we can set up the user for the next
invocation.  Since we now can split an extent into multiple bmap records
due to shared/unshared status, we have to be careful that we don't
overflow the output array.

In the original patch f86f403794b ("xfs: teach get_bmapx about shared
extents and the CoW fork") I used cur_ext (the output index) to check
for overflows, albeit with an off-by-one error.  Since nexleft no longer
describes the number of unfilled slots in the output, we can rip all
that out and use cur_ext for the overflow check directly.

Failure to do this causes heap corruption in bmapx callers such as
xfs_io and xfs_scrub.  xfs/328 can reproduce this problem.

Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>