]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commit
h8300: select generic atomic64_t support
authorFengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:18:56 +0000 (10:18 +1000)
committerStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 06:46:38 +0000 (16:46 +1000)
commitd3b26bf657c310aeaf8dda91e3bd62f5595749a1
treec4cff692f8ec1e83c31ad8835fddf0c233f5a6f3
parent574f6f956fc507470b18509fc783ad8bb41acc6e
h8300: select generic atomic64_t support

Rationales from Eric:

So I just looked a little deeper and it appears architectures that do
not support atomic64_t are broken.

The generic atomic64 support came in 2009 to support the perf subsystem
with the expectation that all architectures would implement atomic64
support.

Furthermore upon inspection of the kernel atomic64_t is used in a fair
number of places beyond the performance counters:

block/blk-cgroup.c
drivers/acpi/apei/
drivers/block/rbd.c
drivers/crypto/nx/nx.h
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/
drivers/staging/octeon/
fs/xfs/
include/linux/perf_event.h
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.h
kernel/events/
kernel/trace/
net/mac80211/key.h
net/rds/

The block control group, infiniband, xfs, crypto, 802.11, netfilter.
Nothing quite so fundamental as fs/namespace.c but definitely in
multiplatform-code that should work, and is already broken on those
architecutres.

Looking at the implementation of atomic64_add_return in lib/atomic64.c the
code looks as efficient as these kinds of things get.

Which leads me to the conclusion that we need atomic64 support on all
architectures.

Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
arch/h8300/Kconfig