bcache: Fix for handling overlapping extents when reading in a btree node

bcache: Fix for handling overlapping extents when reading in a btree node

commit 84786438ed17978d72eeced580ab757e4da8830b upstream.

btree_sort_fixup() was overly clever, because it was trying to avoid
pulling a key off the btree iterator in more than one place.

This led to a really obscure bug where we'd break early from the loop in
btree_sort_fixup() if the current key overlapped with keys in more than
one older set, and the next key it overlapped with was zero size.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>