There is no sensible reason why #dma-cells shouldn't be allowed to be 0. It is
completely up to the DMA controller how many additional parameters, besides the
phandle, it needs to identify a channel. E.g. for DMA controller with only one
channel or for DMA controllers which don't have a restriction on which channel
can be used for which peripheral it completely legitimate to not require any
additional parameters.
Also fixes the following warning:
drivers/dma/of-dma.c: In function 'of_dma_controller_register':
drivers/dma/of-dma.c:67:7: warning: 'nbcells' may be used uninitialized in this function
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
void *data)
{
struct of_dma *ofdma;
- int nbcells;
const __be32 *prop;
if (!np || !of_dma_xlate) {
return -ENOMEM;
prop = of_get_property(np, "#dma-cells", NULL);
- if (prop)
- nbcells = be32_to_cpup(prop);
-
- if (!prop || !nbcells) {
- pr_err("%s: #dma-cells property is missing or invalid\n",
+ if (!prop) {
+ pr_err("%s: #dma-cells property is missing\n",
__func__);
kfree(ofdma);
return -EINVAL;
}
+
ofdma->of_node = np;
- ofdma->of_dma_nbcells = nbcells;
+ ofdma->of_dma_nbcells = be32_to_cpup(prop);
ofdma->of_dma_xlate = of_dma_xlate;
ofdma->of_dma_data = data;