]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commitdiff
amd64_edac: Fix K8 chip select reporting
authorBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:06:00 +0000 (18:06 +0200)
committerBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:55:29 +0000 (16:55 +0200)
This basically reverts 603adaf6b3e3 ("amd64_edac: fix K8 chip select
reporting") because it was a clumsy workaround for DIMM sizes reporting
on K8 which got superceded by a much more correct one with 41d8bfaba70
("amd64_edac: Improve DRAM address mapping") without removing the prior
one. Remove it now finally.

Reported-by: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c

index d21efb246d43ffdef20e11dc94b8f227468b129f..cfb7e57786d19ae9b1d052be3efdc1efd0bdb427 100644 (file)
@@ -1596,14 +1596,11 @@ static void f1x_map_sysaddr_to_csrow(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u64 sys_addr,
  */
 static void amd64_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)
 {
-       int dimm, size0, size1, factor = 0;
+       int dimm, size0, size1;
        u32 *dcsb = ctrl ? pvt->csels[1].csbases : pvt->csels[0].csbases;
        u32 dbam  = ctrl ? pvt->dbam1 : pvt->dbam0;
 
        if (boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0xf) {
-               if (pvt->dclr0 & WIDTH_128)
-                       factor = 1;
-
                /* K8 families < revF not supported yet */
               if (pvt->ext_model < K8_REV_F)
                        return;
@@ -1634,8 +1631,8 @@ static void amd64_debug_display_dimm_sizes(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 ctrl)
                                                     DBAM_DIMM(dimm, dbam));
 
                amd64_info(EDAC_MC ": %d: %5dMB %d: %5dMB\n",
-                               dimm * 2,     size0 << factor,
-                               dimm * 2 + 1, size1 << factor);
+                               dimm * 2,     size0,
+                               dimm * 2 + 1, size1);
        }
 }