return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
}
+static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
+{
+ wbinvd();
+}
+
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
bool enable)
{
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
- int reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
-
- i915_gem_write_fence(obj->base.dev, reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
+ struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ int fence_reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
+
+ /* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
+ * the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
+ * measures on SNB+. In theory, the write to the fence register
+ * flushes all memory transactions before, and coupled with the
+ * mb() placed around the register write we serialise all memory
+ * operations with respect to the changes in the tiler. Yet, on
+ * SNB+ we need to take a step further and emit an explicit wbinvd()
+ * on each processor in order to manually flush all memory
+ * transactions before updating the fence register.
+ */
+ if (HAS_LLC(obj->base.dev))
+ on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, NULL, 1);
+ i915_gem_write_fence(dev, fence_reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
if (enable) {
- obj->fence_reg = reg;
+ obj->fence_reg = fence_reg;
fence->obj = obj;
list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
} else {