return fence - dev_priv->fence_regs;
}
+struct write_fence {
+ struct drm_device *dev;
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+ int fence;
+};
+
static void i915_gem_write_fence__ipi(void *data)
{
+ struct write_fence *args = data;
+
+ /* Required for SNB+ with LLC */
wbinvd();
+
+ /* Required for VLV */
+ i915_gem_write_fence(args->dev, args->fence, args->obj);
}
static void i915_gem_object_update_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
struct drm_i915_fence_reg *fence,
bool enable)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- int fence_reg = fence_number(dev_priv, fence);
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = obj->base.dev->dev_private;
+ struct write_fence args = {
+ .dev = obj->base.dev,
+ .fence = fence_number(dev_priv, fence),
+ .obj = enable ? obj : NULL,
+ };
/* In order to fully serialize access to the fenced region and
* the update to the fence register we need to take extreme
* SNB+ we need to take a step further and emit an explicit wbinvd()
* on each processor in order to manually flush all memory
* transactions before updating the fence register.
+ *
+ * However, Valleyview complicates matter. There the wbinvd is
+ * insufficient and unlike SNB/IVB requires the serialising
+ * register write. (Note that that register write by itself is
+ * conversely not sufficient for SNB+.) To compromise, we do both.
*/
- if (HAS_LLC(obj->base.dev))
- on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, NULL, 1);
- i915_gem_write_fence(dev, fence_reg, enable ? obj : NULL);
+ if (INTEL_INFO(args.dev)->gen >= 6)
+ on_each_cpu(i915_gem_write_fence__ipi, &args, 1);
+ else
+ i915_gem_write_fence(args.dev, args.fence, args.obj);
if (enable) {
- obj->fence_reg = fence_reg;
+ obj->fence_reg = args.fence;
fence->obj = obj;
list_move_tail(&fence->lru_list, &dev_priv->mm.fence_list);
} else {