This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
static int
zoran_register_i2c (struct zoran *zr)
{
- memcpy(&zr->i2c_algo, &zoran_i2c_bit_data_template,
- sizeof(struct i2c_algo_bit_data));
+ zr->i2c_algo = zoran_i2c_bit_data_template;
zr->i2c_algo.data = zr;
strlcpy(zr->i2c_adapter.name, ZR_DEVNAME(zr),
sizeof(zr->i2c_adapter.name));