AVR32: Fix atomic_add_unless() and atomic_sub_unless()

These functions depend on "result" being initalized to 0, but "result"
is not included as an input constraint to the inline assembly block
following its initialization, only as an output constraint. Thus gcc
thinks it doesn't need to initialize it, so result ends up undefined
if the "unless" condition is true.

This fixes an oops in sunrpc where the faulty atomics caused
rpciod_up() to not start the workqueue as it should.

Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
index b9c2548a52f33d0807add5872424f88cc6342967..7ef3862a73d02443d95eaf6520ff45417f3f00d5 100644 (file)
--- a/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
+++ b/include/asm-avr32/atomic.h
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static inline int atomic_sub_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
                "       mov     %1, 1\n"
                "1:"
                : "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
-               : "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u)
+               : "m"(v->counter), "rKs21"(a), "rKs21"(u), "1"(result)
                : "cc", "memory");
 
        return result;
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u)
                        "       mov     %1, 1\n"
                        "1:"
                        : "=&r"(tmp), "=&r"(result), "=o"(v->counter)
-                       : "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u)
+                       : "m"(v->counter), "r"(a), "ir"(u), "1"(result)
                        : "cc", "memory");
        }