Because gcc doesn't realize that rcu_num_lvls must be strictly greater
than zero, some versions give a spurious warning about levelcnt[0] being
uninitialized in rcu_init_one(). This commit updates the condition on
the pre-existing panic() in order to educate gcc on this point.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RCU_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf)); /* Fix buf[] init! */
- /* Silence gcc 4.8 warning about array index out of range. */
- if (rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
- panic("rcu_init_one: rcu_num_lvls overflow");
+ /* Silence gcc 4.8 false positive about array index out of range. */
+ if (rcu_num_lvls <= 0 || rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
+ panic("rcu_init_one: rcu_num_lvls out of range");
/* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */