commit
60db48cacb9b253d5607a5ff206112a59cd09e34 upstream
rtmutex_set_prio() is used to implement priority inheritance for
futexes. When a task is deboosted it gets enqueued at the tail of its
RT priority list. This is violating the POSIX scheduling semantics:
rt priority list X contains two runnable tasks A and B
task A runs with priority X and holds mutex M
task C preempts A and is blocked on mutex M
-> task A is boosted to priority of task C (Y)
task A unlocks the mutex M and deboosts itself
-> A is dequeued from rt priority list Y
-> A is enqueued to the tail of rt priority list X
task C schedules away
task B runs
This is wrong as task A did not schedule away and therefor violates
the POSIX scheduling semantics.
Enqueue the task to the head of the priority list instead.
Reported-by: Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@roche.com>
Reported-by: Carsten Emde <cbe@osadl.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Carsten Emde <cbe@osadl.org>
Tested-by: Mathias Weber <mathias.weber.mw1@roche.com>
LKML-Reference: <
20100120171629.
809074113@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
if (running)
p->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
if (on_rq) {
- enqueue_task(rq, p, 0, false);
+ enqueue_task(rq, p, 0, oldprio < prio);
check_class_changed(rq, p, prev_class, oldprio, running);
}