]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - linux-beck.git/commitdiff
memcg: coalesce uncharge during unmap/truncate
authorKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:47:03 +0000 (16:47 -0800)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:20:07 +0000 (07:20 -0800)
In massive parallel enviroment, res_counter can be a performance
bottleneck.  One strong techinque to reduce lock contention is reducing
calls by coalescing some amount of calls into one.

Considering charge/uncharge chatacteristic,
- charge is done one by one via demand-paging.
- uncharge is done by
- in chunk at munmap, truncate, exit, execve...
- one by one via vmscan/paging.

It seems we have a chance to coalesce uncharges for improving scalability
at unmap/truncation.

This patch is a for coalescing uncharge.  For avoiding scattering memcg's
structure to functions under /mm, this patch adds memcg batch uncharge
information to the task.  A reason for per-task batching is for making use
of caller's context information.  We do batched uncharge (deleyed
uncharge) when truncation/unmap occurs but do direct uncharge when
uncharge is called by memory reclaim (vmscan.c).

The degree of coalescing depends on callers
  - at invalidate/trucate... pagevec size
  - at unmap ....ZAP_BLOCK_SIZE
(memory itself will be freed in this degree.)
Then, we'll not coalescing too much.

On x86-64 8cpu server, I tested overheads of memcg at page fault by
running a program which does map/fault/unmap in a loop. Running
a task per a cpu by taskset and see sum of the number of page faults
in 60secs.

[without memcg config]
  40156968  page-faults              #      0.085 M/sec   ( +-   0.046% )
  27.67 cache-miss/faults
[root cgroup]
  36659599  page-faults              #      0.077 M/sec   ( +-   0.247% )
  31.58 miss/faults
[in a child cgroup]
  18444157  page-faults              #      0.039 M/sec   ( +-   0.133% )
  69.96 miss/faults
[child with this patch]
  27133719  page-faults              #      0.057 M/sec   ( +-   0.155% )
  47.16 miss/faults

We can see some amounts of improvement.
(root cgroup doesn't affected by this patch)
Another patch for "charge" will follow this and above will be improved more.

Changelog(since 2009/10/02):
 - renamed filed of memcg_batch (as pages to bytes, memsw to memsw_bytes)
 - some clean up and commentary/description updates.
 - added initialize code to copy_process(). (possible bug fix)

Changelog(old):
 - fixed !CONFIG_MEM_CGROUP case.
 - rebased onto the latest mmotm + softlimit fix patches.
 - unified patch for callers
 - added commetns.
 - make ->do_batch as bool.
 - removed css_get() at el. We don't need it.

Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
include/linux/memcontrol.h
include/linux/sched.h
kernel/fork.c
mm/memcontrol.c
mm/memory.c
mm/truncate.c

index bf9213b2db8f2da2a443d8788d2d70eb0a003af8..91300c972e76d55ba5de7f315dee74836e52169a 100644 (file)
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@ extern void mem_cgroup_rotate_lru_list(struct page *page, enum lru_list lru);
 extern void mem_cgroup_del_lru(struct page *page);
 extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page,
                                  enum lru_list from, enum lru_list to);
+
+/* For coalescing uncharge for reducing memcg' overhead*/
+extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_start(void);
+extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void);
+
 extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
 extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
 extern int mem_cgroup_shmem_charge_fallback(struct page *page,
@@ -151,6 +156,14 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge_swapin(struct mem_cgroup *ptr)
 {
 }
 
+static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_start(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
 {
 }
index 5c858f38e81a7f03932b928a38e678b9ad5b1ca8..f4c145410a8d9fa8fb7650688c0023057847368c 100644 (file)
@@ -1544,6 +1544,14 @@ struct task_struct {
        unsigned long trace_recursion;
 #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
        unsigned long stack_start;
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR /* memcg uses this to do batch job */
+       struct memcg_batch_info {
+               int do_batch;   /* incremented when batch uncharge started */
+               struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* target memcg of uncharge */
+               unsigned long bytes;            /* uncharged usage */
+               unsigned long memsw_bytes; /* uncharged mem+swap usage */
+       } memcg_batch;
+#endif
 };
 
 /* Future-safe accessor for struct task_struct's cpus_allowed. */
index 9bd91447e052dc381eafa32a19af9d3d5b21bab1..b6cbd33dde807810981558c31236b3bb67fcae09 100644 (file)
@@ -1127,6 +1127,10 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
        p->blocked_on = NULL; /* not blocked yet */
 #endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
+       p->memcg_batch.do_batch = 0;
+       p->memcg_batch.memcg = NULL;
+#endif
 
        p->bts = NULL;
 
index 7b5b108c1c6bb7c25b15c594ad8c7c6c6f2230c7..a730c91b8e69f6822933b191b32cdc2fd3317423 100644 (file)
@@ -1827,6 +1827,50 @@ void mem_cgroup_cancel_charge_swapin(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
        css_put(&mem->css);
 }
 
+static void
+__do_uncharge(struct mem_cgroup *mem, const enum charge_type ctype)
+{
+       struct memcg_batch_info *batch = NULL;
+       bool uncharge_memsw = true;
+       /* If swapout, usage of swap doesn't decrease */
+       if (!do_swap_account || ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT)
+               uncharge_memsw = false;
+       /*
+        * do_batch > 0 when unmapping pages or inode invalidate/truncate.
+        * In those cases, all pages freed continously can be expected to be in
+        * the same cgroup and we have chance to coalesce uncharges.
+        * But we do uncharge one by one if this is killed by OOM(TIF_MEMDIE)
+        * because we want to do uncharge as soon as possible.
+        */
+       if (!current->memcg_batch.do_batch || test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE))
+               goto direct_uncharge;
+
+       batch = &current->memcg_batch;
+       /*
+        * In usual, we do css_get() when we remember memcg pointer.
+        * But in this case, we keep res->usage until end of a series of
+        * uncharges. Then, it's ok to ignore memcg's refcnt.
+        */
+       if (!batch->memcg)
+               batch->memcg = mem;
+       /*
+        * In typical case, batch->memcg == mem. This means we can
+        * merge a series of uncharges to an uncharge of res_counter.
+        * If not, we uncharge res_counter ony by one.
+        */
+       if (batch->memcg != mem)
+               goto direct_uncharge;
+       /* remember freed charge and uncharge it later */
+       batch->bytes += PAGE_SIZE;
+       if (uncharge_memsw)
+               batch->memsw_bytes += PAGE_SIZE;
+       return;
+direct_uncharge:
+       res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
+       if (uncharge_memsw)
+               res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
+       return;
+}
 
 /*
  * uncharge if !page_mapped(page)
@@ -1875,12 +1919,8 @@ __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
                break;
        }
 
-       if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
-               res_counter_uncharge(&mem->res, PAGE_SIZE);
-               if (do_swap_account &&
-                               (ctype != MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT))
-                       res_counter_uncharge(&mem->memsw, PAGE_SIZE);
-       }
+       if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
+               __do_uncharge(mem, ctype);
        if (ctype == MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SWAPOUT)
                mem_cgroup_swap_statistics(mem, true);
        mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(mem, pc, false);
@@ -1926,6 +1966,50 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page)
        __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(page, MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Batch_start/batch_end is called in unmap_page_range/invlidate/trucate.
+ * In that cases, pages are freed continuously and we can expect pages
+ * are in the same memcg. All these calls itself limits the number of
+ * pages freed at once, then uncharge_start/end() is called properly.
+ * This may be called prural(2) times in a context,
+ */
+
+void mem_cgroup_uncharge_start(void)
+{
+       current->memcg_batch.do_batch++;
+       /* We can do nest. */
+       if (current->memcg_batch.do_batch == 1) {
+               current->memcg_batch.memcg = NULL;
+               current->memcg_batch.bytes = 0;
+               current->memcg_batch.memsw_bytes = 0;
+       }
+}
+
+void mem_cgroup_uncharge_end(void)
+{
+       struct memcg_batch_info *batch = &current->memcg_batch;
+
+       if (!batch->do_batch)
+               return;
+
+       batch->do_batch--;
+       if (batch->do_batch) /* If stacked, do nothing. */
+               return;
+
+       if (!batch->memcg)
+               return;
+       /*
+        * This "batch->memcg" is valid without any css_get/put etc...
+        * bacause we hide charges behind us.
+        */
+       if (batch->bytes)
+               res_counter_uncharge(&batch->memcg->res, batch->bytes);
+       if (batch->memsw_bytes)
+               res_counter_uncharge(&batch->memcg->memsw, batch->memsw_bytes);
+       /* forget this pointer (for sanity check) */
+       batch->memcg = NULL;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
 /*
  * called after __delete_from_swap_cache() and drop "page" account.
index a54b2c498444dca8d8b41bb59d65640915f1a684..aed45eaf8ac9138442c020b6ab9f49c63604eb95 100644 (file)
@@ -956,6 +956,7 @@ static unsigned long unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
                details = NULL;
 
        BUG_ON(addr >= end);
+       mem_cgroup_uncharge_start();
        tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
        pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
        do {
@@ -968,6 +969,7 @@ static unsigned long unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
                                                zap_work, details);
        } while (pgd++, addr = next, (addr != end && *zap_work > 0));
        tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
+       mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
 
        return addr;
 }
index 2c147a7e5f2ce7e882e8510d7a1f2088d7f7380a..342deee22684ffdfded563506d684ef0f2b18191 100644 (file)
@@ -272,6 +272,7 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct address_space *mapping,
                        pagevec_release(&pvec);
                        break;
                }
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_start();
                for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++) {
                        struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
 
@@ -286,6 +287,7 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct address_space *mapping,
                        unlock_page(page);
                }
                pagevec_release(&pvec);
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
        }
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages_range);
@@ -327,6 +329,7 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
        pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
        while (next <= end &&
                        pagevec_lookup(&pvec, mapping, next, PAGEVEC_SIZE)) {
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_start();
                for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++) {
                        struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
                        pgoff_t index;
@@ -354,6 +357,7 @@ unsigned long invalidate_mapping_pages(struct address_space *mapping,
                                break;
                }
                pagevec_release(&pvec);
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
                cond_resched();
        }
        return ret;
@@ -428,6 +432,7 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
        while (next <= end && !wrapped &&
                pagevec_lookup(&pvec, mapping, next,
                        min(end - next, (pgoff_t)PAGEVEC_SIZE - 1) + 1)) {
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_start();
                for (i = 0; i < pagevec_count(&pvec); i++) {
                        struct page *page = pvec.pages[i];
                        pgoff_t page_index;
@@ -477,6 +482,7 @@ int invalidate_inode_pages2_range(struct address_space *mapping,
                        unlock_page(page);
                }
                pagevec_release(&pvec);
+               mem_cgroup_uncharge_end();
                cond_resched();
        }
        return ret;