Several tests in the NAS benchmark seem to run a lot slower with
NUMA balancing enabled, than with NUMA balancing disabled. The
slower run time corresponds with increased idle time.
Overriding the final test of migrate_degrades_locality (but still
doing the other NUMA tests first) seems to improve performance
of those benchmarks.
Reported-by: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170623165530.22514-2-riel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
if (dst_nid == p->numa_preferred_nid)
return 0;
+ /* Leaving a core idle is often worse than degrading locality. */
+ if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE)
+ return -1;
+
if (numa_group) {
src_faults = group_faults(p, src_nid);
dst_faults = group_faults(p, dst_nid);