that check will have to be done by all users
of xhci_suspend() so it sounds a lot better to
move the check to xhci_suspend() in order to
avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
static int xhci_pci_suspend(struct usb_hcd *hcd, bool do_wakeup)
{
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
- int retval = 0;
- if (hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
- xhci->shared_hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- retval = xhci_suspend(xhci);
-
- return retval;
+ return xhci_suspend(xhci);
}
static int xhci_pci_resume(struct usb_hcd *hcd, bool hibernated)
struct usb_hcd *hcd = xhci_to_hcd(xhci);
u32 command;
+ if (hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED ||
+ xhci->shared_hcd->state != HC_STATE_SUSPENDED)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
spin_lock_irq(&xhci->lock);
clear_bit(HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE, &hcd->flags);
clear_bit(HCD_FLAG_HW_ACCESSIBLE, &xhci->shared_hcd->flags);