The changes to ldlm_cancel_aged_policy() introduced from LU-4300
was incorrect. This patch revert this part of changes.
Signed-off-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/12448
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-5727
Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jinshan Xiong <jinshan.xiong@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
int unused, int added,
int count)
{
- if (added >= count)
- return LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK;
-
- if (time_before(cfs_time_current(),
+ if ((added >= count) &&
+ time_before(cfs_time_current(),
cfs_time_add(lock->l_last_used, ns->ns_max_age)))
return LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK;