res_counter_charge() always returns -ENOMEM when the limit is reached and
the charge thus can't happen.
However it's up to the caller to interpret this failure and return the
appropriate error value. The task counter subsystem will need to report
the user that a fork() has been cancelled because of some limit reached,
not because we are too short on memory.
Fix this by returning -1 when res_counter_charge() fails.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Tim Hockin <thockin@hockin.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
limit_fail_at parameter is set to the particular res_counter element
where the charging failed.
+ It returns 0 on success and -1 on failure.
+
d. int res_counter_charge_locked
(struct res_counter *rc, unsigned long val)
{
if (counter->usage + val > counter->limit) {
counter->failcnt++;
- return -ENOMEM;
+ return -1;
}
counter->usage += val;