commit
87ed50036b866db2ec2ba16b2a7aec4a2b0b7c39 upstream.
If the rpc_task exits while holding the socket write lock before it has
allocated an rpc slot, then the usual mechanism for releasing the write
lock in xprt_release() is defeated.
The problem occurs if the call to xprt_lock_write() initially fails, so
that the rpc_task is put on the xprt->sending wait queue. If the task
exits after being assigned the lock by __xprt_lock_write_func, but
before it has retried the call to xprt_lock_and_alloc_slot(), then
it calls xprt_release() while holding the write lock, but will
immediately exit due to the test for task->tk_rqstp != NULL.
Reported-by: Chris Perl <chris.perl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
static void rpc_release_resources_task(struct rpc_task *task)
{
- if (task->tk_rqstp)
- xprt_release(task);
+ xprt_release(task);
if (task->tk_msg.rpc_cred) {
put_rpccred(task->tk_msg.rpc_cred);
task->tk_msg.rpc_cred = NULL;
void xprt_release(struct rpc_task *task)
{
struct rpc_xprt *xprt;
- struct rpc_rqst *req;
+ struct rpc_rqst *req = task->tk_rqstp;
- if (!(req = task->tk_rqstp))
+ if (req == NULL) {
+ if (task->tk_client) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ xprt = rcu_dereference(task->tk_client->cl_xprt);
+ if (xprt->snd_task == task)
+ xprt_release_write(xprt, task);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
return;
+ }
xprt = req->rq_xprt;
rpc_count_iostats(task);