(cherry picked from commit
3e515705a1f46beb1c942bb8043c16f8ac7b1e9e)
If some vcpus are created before KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP, then
irqchip_in_kernel() and vcpu->arch.apic will be inconsistent, leading
to potential NULL pointer dereferences.
Fix by:
- ensuring that no vcpus are installed when KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP is called
- ensuring that a vcpu has an apic if it is installed after KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP
This is somewhat long winded because vcpu->arch.apic is created without
kvm->lock held.
Based on earlier patch by Michael Ellerman.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
#define PALE_RESET_ENTRY 0x80000000ffffffb0UL
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kcm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *v;
r = -EEXIST;
if (kvm->arch.vpic)
goto create_irqchip_unlock;
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus))
+ goto create_irqchip_unlock;
r = -ENOMEM;
vpic = kvm_create_pic(kvm);
if (vpic) {
kvm_x86_ops->check_processor_compatibility(rtn);
}
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) == (vcpu->arch.apic != NULL);
+}
+
int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
struct page *page;
{
return vcpu->kvm->bsp_vcpu_id == vcpu->vcpu_id;
}
+
+bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+#else
+
+static inline bool kvm_vcpu_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return true; }
+
#endif
#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_DEVICE_ASSIGNMENT
goto vcpu_destroy;
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ if (!kvm_vcpu_compatible(vcpu)) {
+ r = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;
+ }
if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) == KVM_MAX_VCPUS) {
r = -EINVAL;
goto unlock_vcpu_destroy;