When we add a nft rule like follows:
# nft add rule filter test tcp dport vmap {1: jump test}
-ELOOP error will be returned, and the anonymous set will be
destroyed.
But after that, nf_tables_abort will also try to remove the
element and destroy the set, which was already destroyed and
freed.
If we add a nft wrong rule, nft_tables_abort will do the cleanup
work rightly, so nf_tables_set_destroy call here is redundant and
wrong, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@spreadtrum.com>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
iter.fn = nf_tables_bind_check_setelem;
set->ops->walk(ctx, set, &iter);
- if (iter.err < 0) {
- /* Destroy anonymous sets if binding fails */
- if (set->flags & NFT_SET_ANONYMOUS)
- nf_tables_set_destroy(ctx, set);
-
+ if (iter.err < 0)
return iter.err;
- }
}
bind:
binding->chain = ctx->chain;