]> git.karo-electronics.de Git - karo-tx-linux.git/commitdiff
arm64: cpufeature: treat unknown fields as RES0
authorMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Mon, 9 Jan 2017 17:28:24 +0000 (17:28 +0000)
committerWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Tue, 10 Jan 2017 17:11:23 +0000 (17:11 +0000)
Any fields not defined in an arm64_ftr_bits entry are propagated to the
system-wide register value in init_cpu_ftr_reg(), and while we require
that these strictly match for the sanity checks, we don't update them in
update_cpu_ftr_reg().

Generally, the lack of an arm64_ftr_bits entry indicates that the bits
are currently RES0 (as is the case for the upper 32 bits of all
supposedly 32-bit registers).

A better default would be to use zero for the system-wide value of
unallocated bits, making all register checking consistent, and allowing
for subsequent simplifications to the arm64_ftr_bits arrays.

This patch updates init_cpu_ftr_reg() to treat unallocated bits as RES0
for the purpose of the system-wide safe value. These bits will still be
sanity checked with strict match requirements, as is currently the case.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c

index e8f6dfba197312efb765f1c2adabfd2d88e2910f..9cc198e81613b41f461042dda2ac408aecd7fcc8 100644 (file)
@@ -415,23 +415,33 @@ static void __init sort_ftr_regs(void)
 /*
  * Initialise the CPU feature register from Boot CPU values.
  * Also initiliases the strict_mask for the register.
+ * Any bits that are not covered by an arm64_ftr_bits entry are considered
+ * RES0 for the system-wide value, and must strictly match.
  */
 static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
 {
        u64 val = 0;
        u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL;
+       u64 valid_mask = 0;
+
        const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
        struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
 
        BUG_ON(!reg);
 
        for (ftrp  = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
+               u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
                s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new);
 
                val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new);
+
+               valid_mask |= ftr_mask;
                if (!ftrp->strict)
-                       strict_mask &= ~arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
+                       strict_mask &= ~ftr_mask;
        }
+
+       val &= valid_mask;
+
        reg->sys_val = val;
        reg->strict_mask = strict_mask;
 }