ARM: dts: socfpga: Remove unit name for LEDs in EBV SOCrates

GPIO LEDs in the Cyclone5 EBV SOCrates board have a unit name but no reg
property. Indeed, GPIO LEDs do not need such a property. They do not
need a unit name neither. This will trigger the following warnings when
compiled with W=1:

Node /gpio-leds/led@0 has a unit name, but no reg property
Node /gpio-leds/led@1 has a unit name, but no reg property
Node /gpio-leds/led@2 has a unit name, but no reg property

The solution is to remove the unit name. In order to have unique node
names, a rename is necessary. This should be harmless as all the LEDs
have a 'label' property, hence their name do not derive from the node
name and will stay the same after this patch.

Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@heig-vd.ch>
Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts
index 8e3b0173ccf1cf2ba20228e7fa27fd9fa8199a0c..53bf99eef66de70fba4647fb9592750afffee486 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts
@@ -60,18 +60,18 @@
 &leds {
        compatible = "gpio-leds";
 
-       led@0 {
+       led0 {
                label = "led:green:heartbeat";
                gpios = <&porta 28 1>;
                linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
        };
 
-       led@1 {
+       led1 {
                label = "led:green:D7";
                gpios = <&portb 19 1>;
        };
 
-       led@2 {
+       led2 {
                label = "led:green:D8";
                gpios = <&portb 25 1>;
        };