commit
7ed9f7e5db58c6e8c2b4b738a75d5dcd8e17aad5 upstream.
Jesper noted that kmem_cache_destroy() invokes synchronize_rcu() rather than
rcu_barrier() in the SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU case, which could result in RCU
callbacks accessing a kmem_cache after it had been destroyed.
Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
}
if (unlikely(cachep->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU))
- synchronize_rcu();
+ rcu_barrier();
__kmem_cache_destroy(cachep);
mutex_unlock(&cache_chain_mutex);
void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *c)
{
+ if (c->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
+ rcu_barrier();
slob_free(c, sizeof(struct kmem_cache));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy);
*/
void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
{
+ if (s->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)
+ rcu_barrier();
down_write(&slub_lock);
s->refcount--;
if (!s->refcount) {