Fix following circular locking in the opl3 driver.
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-rc3 #87
-------------------------------------------------------
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
(&opl3->voice_lock){..-...}, at: [<
cca748fe>] snd_opl3_note_off+0x1e/0xe0 [snd_opl3_synth]
but task is already holding lock:
(&opl3->sys_timer_lock){..-...}, at: [<
cca75169>] snd_opl3_timer_func+0x19/0xc0 [snd_opl3_synth]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&opl3->sys_timer_lock){..-...}:
[<
c02461d5>] validate_chain+0xa25/0x1040
[<
c0246aca>] __lock_acquire+0x2da/0xab0
[<
c024731a>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0
[<
c044c300>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x40/0x60
[<
cca75046>] snd_opl3_note_on+0x686/0x790 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
cca68912>] snd_midi_process_event+0x322/0x590 [snd_seq_midi_emul]
[<
cca74245>] snd_opl3_synth_event_input+0x15/0x20 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
cca4dcc0>] snd_seq_deliver_single_event+0x100/0x200 [snd_seq]
[<
cca4de07>] snd_seq_deliver_event+0x47/0x1f0 [snd_seq]
[<
cca4e50b>] snd_seq_dispatch_event+0x3b/0x140 [snd_seq]
[<
cca5008c>] snd_seq_check_queue+0x10c/0x120 [snd_seq]
[<
cca5037b>] snd_seq_enqueue_event+0x6b/0xe0 [snd_seq]
[<
cca4e0fd>] snd_seq_client_enqueue_event+0xdd/0x100 [snd_seq]
[<
cca4eb7a>] snd_seq_write+0xea/0x190 [snd_seq]
[<
c02827b6>] vfs_write+0x96/0x160
[<
c0282c9d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
[<
c0202c45>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
-> #0 (&opl3->voice_lock){..-...}:
[<
c02467e6>] validate_chain+0x1036/0x1040
[<
c0246aca>] __lock_acquire+0x2da/0xab0
[<
c024731a>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0
[<
c044c300>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x40/0x60
[<
cca748fe>] snd_opl3_note_off+0x1e/0xe0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
cca751f0>] snd_opl3_timer_func+0xa0/0xc0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
c022ac46>] run_timer_softirq+0x166/0x1e0
[<
c02269e8>] __do_softirq+0x78/0x110
[<
c0226ac6>] do_softirq+0x46/0x50
[<
c0226e26>] irq_exit+0x36/0x40
[<
c0204bd2>] do_IRQ+0x42/0xb0
[<
c020328e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x40
[<
c021092f>] apm_cpu_idle+0x10f/0x290
[<
c0201b11>] cpu_idle+0x21/0x40
[<
c04443cd>] rest_init+0x4d/0x60
[<
c055c835>] start_kernel+0x235/0x280
[<
c055c066>] i386_start_kernel+0x66/0x70
other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by swapper/0:
#0: (&opl3->tlist){+.-...}, at: [<
c022abd0>] run_timer_softirq+0xf0/0x1e0
#1: (&opl3->sys_timer_lock){..-...}, at: [<
cca75169>] snd_opl3_timer_func+0x19/0xc0 [snd_opl3_synth]
stack backtrace:
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32-rc3 #87
Call Trace:
[<
c0245188>] print_circular_bug+0xc8/0xd0
[<
c02467e6>] validate_chain+0x1036/0x1040
[<
c0247f14>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x54/0xd0
[<
c0246aca>] __lock_acquire+0x2da/0xab0
[<
c024731a>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa0
[<
cca748fe>] ? snd_opl3_note_off+0x1e/0xe0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
c044c300>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x40/0x60
[<
cca748fe>] ? snd_opl3_note_off+0x1e/0xe0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
cca748fe>] snd_opl3_note_off+0x1e/0xe0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
c044c307>] ? _spin_lock_irqsave+0x47/0x60
[<
cca751f0>] snd_opl3_timer_func+0xa0/0xc0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
c022ac46>] run_timer_softirq+0x166/0x1e0
[<
c022abd0>] ? run_timer_softirq+0xf0/0x1e0
[<
cca75150>] ? snd_opl3_timer_func+0x0/0xc0 [snd_opl3_synth]
[<
c02269e8>] __do_softirq+0x78/0x110
[<
c044c0fd>] ? _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20
[<
c025915f>] ? handle_level_irq+0xaf/0xe0
[<
c0226ac6>] do_softirq+0x46/0x50
[<
c0226e26>] irq_exit+0x36/0x40
[<
c0204bd2>] do_IRQ+0x42/0xb0
[<
c024463c>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12c/0x180
[<
c020328e>] common_interrupt+0x2e/0x40
[<
c0208d88>] ? default_idle+0x38/0x50
[<
c021092f>] apm_cpu_idle+0x10f/0x290
[<
c0201b11>] cpu_idle+0x21/0x40
[<
c04443cd>] rest_init+0x4d/0x60
[<
c055c835>] start_kernel+0x235/0x280
[<
c055c210>] ? unknown_bootoption+0x0/0x210
[<
c055c066>] i386_start_kernel+0x66/0x70
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
extern int use_internal_drums;
+static void snd_opl3_note_off_unsafe(void *p, int note, int vel,
+ struct snd_midi_channel *chan);
/*
* The next table looks magical, but it certainly is not. Its values have
* been calculated as table[i]=8*log(i/64)/log(2) with an obvious exception
int again = 0;
int i;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&opl3->sys_timer_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < opl3->max_voices; i++) {
struct snd_opl3_voice *vp = &opl3->voices[i];
if (vp->state > 0 && vp->note_off_check) {
if (vp->note_off == jiffies)
- snd_opl3_note_off(opl3, vp->note, 0, vp->chan);
+ snd_opl3_note_off_unsafe(opl3, vp->note, 0,
+ vp->chan);
else
again++;
}
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&opl3->sys_timer_lock, flags);
if (again) {
opl3->tlist.expires = jiffies + 1; /* invoke again */
add_timer(&opl3->tlist);
/*
* Release a note in response to a midi note off.
*/
-void snd_opl3_note_off(void *p, int note, int vel, struct snd_midi_channel *chan)
+static void snd_opl3_note_off_unsafe(void *p, int note, int vel,
+ struct snd_midi_channel *chan)
{
struct snd_opl3 *opl3;
int voice;
struct snd_opl3_voice *vp;
- unsigned long flags;
-
opl3 = p;
#ifdef DEBUG_MIDI
chan->number, chan->midi_program, note);
#endif
- spin_lock_irqsave(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
-
if (opl3->synth_mode == SNDRV_OPL3_MODE_SEQ) {
if (chan->drum_channel && use_internal_drums) {
snd_opl3_drum_switch(opl3, note, vel, 0, chan);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
return;
}
/* this loop will hopefully kill all extra voices, because
snd_opl3_kill_voice(opl3, voice);
}
}
+}
+
+void snd_opl3_note_off(void *p, int note, int vel,
+ struct snd_midi_channel *chan)
+{
+ struct snd_opl3 *opl3 = p;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
+ snd_opl3_note_off_unsafe(p, note, vel, chan);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&opl3->voice_lock, flags);
}