drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c: fix error caused by shifted mask

During the development of this driver an in-house register documentation
was used.  The last week some integration tests were done and this problem
was found.  It turned out that the released register documentation is
wrong.

The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.

Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
index ee14662ed5cef46b845aeeb3557e55dcd6580efb..98cae529373f44aa202a1a5c0f9d2f2259ab0e98 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-ot200.c
@@ -47,37 +47,37 @@ static struct ot200_led leds[] = {
        {
                .name = "led_1",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(7),
+               .mask = BIT(6),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_2",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(6),
+               .mask = BIT(5),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_3",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(5),
+               .mask = BIT(4),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_4",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(4),
+               .mask = BIT(3),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_5",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(3),
+               .mask = BIT(2),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_6",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(2),
+               .mask = BIT(1),
        },
        {
                .name = "led_7",
                .port = 0x49,
-               .mask = BIT(1),
+               .mask = BIT(0),
        }
 };