From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 00:09:59 +0000 (-0700) Subject: perf/x86/intel: Use new topology_max_smt_threads() in HT leak workaround X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=030ba6cd105c68ce919c5e239853b567490cd059;p=linux-beck.git perf/x86/intel: Use new topology_max_smt_threads() in HT leak workaround Now that we have topology_max_smt_threads() use it to detect the HT workarounds for older CPUs. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: jolsa@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463703002-19686-6-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c index 593b1676b5d1..5081b4cdad0d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c @@ -3989,16 +3989,14 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void) */ static __init int fixup_ht_bug(void) { - int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - int w, c; + int c; /* * problem not present on this CPU model, nothing to do */ if (!(x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_EXCL_ENABLED)) return 0; - w = cpumask_weight(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)); - if (w > 1) { + if (topology_max_smt_threads() > 1) { pr_info("PMU erratum BJ122, BV98, HSD29 worked around, HT is on\n"); return 0; }