From: Kalle Valo Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:02:11 +0000 (+0200) Subject: ath10k: refactor ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode() X-Git-Tag: v4.11-rc1~124^2~264^2^2~24 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=06efdbe70f9c3bf98e6baacb80b6bac416a6818a;p=karo-tx-linux.git ath10k: refactor ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode() When adding VHT160 support to ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode() the VHT mode selection code becomes too complex. Simplify it by refactoring the vht part to a separate function. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo --- diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c index d1b7edba5e49..2f6f777ae049 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c @@ -2533,6 +2533,21 @@ static bool ath10k_mac_sta_has_ofdm_only(struct ieee80211_sta *sta) ATH10K_MAC_FIRST_OFDM_RATE_IDX; } +static enum wmi_phy_mode ath10k_mac_get_phymode_vht(struct ath10k *ar, + struct ieee80211_sta *sta) +{ + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) + return MODE_11AC_VHT80; + + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40) + return MODE_11AC_VHT40; + + if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20) + return MODE_11AC_VHT20; + + return MODE_UNKNOWN; +} + static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(struct ath10k *ar, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, @@ -2579,12 +2594,7 @@ static void ath10k_peer_assoc_h_phymode(struct ath10k *ar, */ if (sta->vht_cap.vht_supported && !ath10k_peer_assoc_h_vht_masked(vht_mcs_mask)) { - if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_80) - phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT80; - else if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40) - phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT40; - else if (sta->bandwidth == IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_20) - phymode = MODE_11AC_VHT20; + phymode = ath10k_mac_get_phymode_vht(ar, sta); } else if (sta->ht_cap.ht_supported && !ath10k_peer_assoc_h_ht_masked(ht_mcs_mask)) { if (sta->bandwidth >= IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_40)