From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:50:42 +0000 (-0400) Subject: timekeeping: Add missing update call in timekeeping_resume() X-Git-Tag: v3.2.24~25 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0ad70925ab61c308d669d93f02c7bf1974a5158f;p=karo-tx-linux.git timekeeping: Add missing update call in timekeeping_resume() This is a backport of 3e997130bd2e8c6f5aaa49d6e3161d4d29b43ab0 The leap second rework unearthed another issue of inconsistent data. On timekeeping_resume() the timekeeper data is updated, but nothing calls timekeeping_update(), so now the update code in the timer interrupt sees stale values. This has been the case before those changes, but then the timer interrupt was using stale data as well so this went unnoticed for quite some time. Add the missing update call, so all the data is consistent everywhere. Reported-by: Andreas Schwab Reported-and-tested-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Reported-and-tested-by: Martin Steigerwald Cc: LKML Cc: Linux PM list Cc: John Stultz Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Cc: Prarit Bhargava Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [John Stultz: Backported to 3.2] Cc: Prarit Bhargava Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linux Kernel Signed-off-by: John Stultz Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings --- diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 4938c5e293a4..03e67d458b8f 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -699,6 +699,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void) timekeeper.clock->cycle_last = timekeeper.clock->read(timekeeper.clock); timekeeper.ntp_error = 0; timekeeping_suspended = 0; + timekeeping_update(false); write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags); touch_softlockup_watchdog();