From: Jonghwan Choi Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 23:57:48 +0000 (-0800) Subject: cpufreq: exynos: Split exynos_target function into two functions X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0e0e425f58fc91b7559350e12060938f8fa7a1c2;p=linux-beck.git cpufreq: exynos: Split exynos_target function into two functions Split exynos_target function into exynos_target & exynos_cpufreq_scale. The exynos_cpufreq_scale changes the voltage & frequency. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c index 0d40eb7b1dee..232208cf6c03 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c @@ -42,54 +42,55 @@ static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu) return clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000; } -static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation) +static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq) +{ + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; + int index; + + for (index = 0; + freq_table[index].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; index++) + if (freq_table[index].frequency == freq) + break; + + if (freq_table[index].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) + return -EINVAL; + + return index; +} + +static int exynos_cpufreq_scale(unsigned int target_freq) { - unsigned int index, old_index; - unsigned int arm_volt, safe_arm_volt = 0; - int ret = 0; struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; unsigned int *volt_table = exynos_info->volt_table; + struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0); + unsigned int arm_volt, safe_arm_volt = 0; unsigned int mpll_freq_khz = exynos_info->mpll_freq_khz; - - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); + unsigned int index, old_index; + int ret = 0; freqs.old = policy->cur; + freqs.cpu = policy->cpu; - if (frequency_locked && target_freq != locking_frequency) { - ret = -EAGAIN; + if (target_freq == freqs.old) goto out; - } /* * The policy max have been changed so that we cannot get proper * old_index with cpufreq_frequency_table_target(). Thus, ignore * policy and get the index from the raw freqeuncy table. */ - for (old_index = 0; - freq_table[old_index].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; - old_index++) - if (freq_table[old_index].frequency == freqs.old) - break; - - if (freq_table[old_index].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) { - ret = -EINVAL; + old_index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(freqs.old); + if (old_index < 0) { + ret = old_index; goto out; } - if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, - target_freq, relation, &index)) { - ret = -EINVAL; + index = exynos_cpufreq_get_index(target_freq); + if (index < 0) { + ret = index; goto out; } - freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; - freqs.cpu = policy->cpu; - - if (freqs.new == freqs.old) - goto out; - /* * ARM clock source will be changed APLL to MPLL temporary * To support this level, need to control regulator for @@ -109,13 +110,23 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, /* When the new frequency is higher than current frequency */ if ((freqs.new > freqs.old) && !safe_arm_volt) { /* Firstly, voltage up to increase frequency */ - regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, - arm_volt); + ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, arm_volt); + if (ret) { + pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n", + __func__, arm_volt); + goto out; + } } - if (safe_arm_volt) - regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, safe_arm_volt, + if (safe_arm_volt) { + ret = regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, safe_arm_volt, safe_arm_volt); + if (ret) { + pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n", + __func__, safe_arm_volt); + goto out; + } + } exynos_info->set_freq(old_index, index); @@ -128,8 +139,43 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, /* down the voltage after frequency change */ regulator_set_voltage(arm_regulator, arm_volt, arm_volt); + if (ret) { + pr_err("%s: failed to set cpu voltage to %d\n", + __func__, arm_volt); + goto out; + } + } + +out: + + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); + + return ret; +} + +static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int relation) +{ + struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table; + unsigned int index; + int ret; + + mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); + + if (frequency_locked) + goto out; + + if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, freq_table, + target_freq, relation, &index)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; } + freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency; + + ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(freqs.new); + out: mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); @@ -166,51 +212,26 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) static int exynos_cpufreq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long pm_event, void *v) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(0); /* boot CPU */ - static unsigned int saved_frequency; - unsigned int temp; + int ret; - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); switch (pm_event) { case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE: - if (frequency_locked) - goto out; - + mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); frequency_locked = true; + mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - if (locking_frequency) { - saved_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); + ret = exynos_cpufreq_scale(locking_frequency); + if (ret < 0) + return NOTIFY_BAD; - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - exynos_target(policy, locking_frequency, - CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - } break; case PM_POST_SUSPEND: - if (saved_frequency) { - /* - * While frequency_locked, only locking_frequency - * is valid for target(). In order to use - * saved_frequency while keeping frequency_locked, - * we temporarly overwrite locking_frequency. - */ - temp = locking_frequency; - locking_frequency = saved_frequency; - - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); - exynos_target(policy, locking_frequency, - CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); - mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); - - locking_frequency = temp; - } + mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock); frequency_locked = false; + mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); break; } -out: - mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_lock); return NOTIFY_OK; }