From: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:29:28 +0000 (+0300)
Subject: Bluetooth: Make auth_req mask dependent on SC enabled or not
X-Git-Tag: v3.19-rc1~118^2~28^2~5^2~91
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0edb14de5606e145d14ae218103030269abcc152;p=karo-tx-linux.git

Bluetooth: Make auth_req mask dependent on SC enabled or not

If we haven't enabled SC support on our side we should use the same mask
for the authentication requirement as we were using before SC support
was added, otherwise we should use the extended mask for SC.

Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
---

diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
index 069b76e03b57..bfa839eed89b 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c
@@ -35,8 +35,9 @@
 
 #define SMP_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(30000)
 
-#define AUTH_REQ_MASK   0x07
-#define KEY_DIST_MASK	0x07
+#define AUTH_REQ_MASK(dev)	(test_bit(HCI_SC_ENABLED, &(dev)->dev_flags) ? \
+				 0x1f : 0x07)
+#define KEY_DIST_MASK		0x07
 
 enum {
 	SMP_FLAG_TK_VALID,
@@ -332,7 +333,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
 		req->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
 		req->init_key_dist = local_dist;
 		req->resp_key_dist = remote_dist;
-		req->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK);
+		req->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev));
 
 		smp->remote_key_dist = remote_dist;
 		return;
@@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ static void build_pairing_cmd(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
 	rsp->max_key_size = SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
 	rsp->init_key_dist = req->init_key_dist & remote_dist;
 	rsp->resp_key_dist = req->resp_key_dist & local_dist;
-	rsp->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK);
+	rsp->auth_req = (authreq & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev));
 
 	smp->remote_key_dist = rsp->init_key_dist;
 }
@@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		return SMP_UNSPECIFIED;
 
 	/* We didn't start the pairing, so match remote */
-	auth = req->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;
+	auth = req->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev);
 
 	if (!test_bit(HCI_BONDABLE, &hdev->dev_flags) &&
 	    (auth & SMP_AUTH_BONDING))
@@ -997,6 +998,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct smp_cmd_pairing *req, *rsp = (void *) skb->data;
 	struct l2cap_chan *chan = conn->smp;
 	struct smp_chan *smp = chan->data;
+	struct hci_dev *hdev = conn->hcon->hdev;
 	u8 key_size, auth;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -1016,7 +1018,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_pairing_rsp(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (check_enc_key_size(conn, key_size))
 		return SMP_ENC_KEY_SIZE;
 
-	auth = rsp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;
+	auth = rsp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev);
 
 	/* If we need MITM check that it can be achieved */
 	if (conn->hcon->pending_sec_level >= BT_SECURITY_HIGH) {
@@ -1151,6 +1153,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	struct smp_cmd_security_req *rp = (void *) skb->data;
 	struct smp_cmd_pairing cp;
 	struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon;
+	struct hci_dev *hdev = hcon->hdev;
 	struct smp_chan *smp;
 	u8 sec_level, auth;
 
@@ -1162,7 +1165,7 @@ static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	if (hcon->role != HCI_ROLE_MASTER)
 		return SMP_CMD_NOTSUPP;
 
-	auth = rp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK;
+	auth = rp->auth_req & AUTH_REQ_MASK(hdev);
 
 	if (hcon->io_capability == HCI_IO_NO_INPUT_OUTPUT)
 		sec_level = BT_SECURITY_MEDIUM;