From: Chao Yu Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:16:24 +0000 (+0800) Subject: f2fs: reduce region of f2fs_lock_op covered for better concurrency X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1256010ab1a372c8ffc01fc37ff767d8bc15378b;p=linux-beck.git f2fs: reduce region of f2fs_lock_op covered for better concurrency In our rename process, region of f2fs_lock_op covered is too big as some of the code like f2fs_empty_dir/f2fs_find_entry are not needed to protect by this lock. So in the extreme case like doing checkpoint when we rename old inode to exist inode in a large directory could cause lower concurrency. Let's reduce the region of f2fs_lock_op to fix this. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- diff --git a/fs/f2fs/namei.c b/fs/f2fs/namei.c index 89b0bd9420cc..1b3cae03c24f 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/namei.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/namei.c @@ -387,8 +387,6 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, goto out_old; } - f2fs_lock_op(sbi); - if (new_inode) { err = -ENOTEMPTY; @@ -401,6 +399,8 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, if (!new_entry) goto out_dir; + f2fs_lock_op(sbi); + err = acquire_orphan_inode(sbi); if (err) goto put_out_dir; @@ -429,9 +429,13 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, update_inode_page(old_inode); update_inode_page(new_inode); } else { + f2fs_lock_op(sbi); + err = f2fs_add_link(new_dentry, old_inode); - if (err) + if (err) { + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); goto out_dir; + } if (old_dir_entry) { inc_nlink(new_dir); @@ -466,6 +470,7 @@ static int f2fs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, return 0; put_out_dir: + f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); kunmap(new_page); f2fs_put_page(new_page, 0); out_dir: @@ -473,7 +478,6 @@ out_dir: kunmap(old_dir_page); f2fs_put_page(old_dir_page, 0); } - f2fs_unlock_op(sbi); out_old: kunmap(old_page); f2fs_put_page(old_page, 0);