From: Paul E. McKenney Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:01:23 +0000 (-0700) Subject: documentation: Add acquire/release barriers to pairing rules X-Git-Tag: v3.17-rc1~137^2^2~3 X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=128ea442b12ba63614dccc9b54726cf753aa4758;p=karo-tx-linux.git documentation: Add acquire/release barriers to pairing rules It is possible to pair acquire and release barriers with other barriers, so this commit adds them to the list in the SMP barrier pairing section. Reported-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett [ paulmck: Updated pairing discussion as suggested by Peter Zijlstra. ] --- diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt index a6ca533a73fc..a4de88fb55f0 100644 --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt @@ -757,10 +757,14 @@ SMP BARRIER PAIRING When dealing with CPU-CPU interactions, certain types of memory barrier should always be paired. A lack of appropriate pairing is almost certainly an error. -A write barrier should always be paired with a data dependency barrier or read -barrier, though a general barrier would also be viable. Similarly a read -barrier or a data dependency barrier should always be paired with at least an -write barrier, though, again, a general barrier is viable: +General barriers pair with each other, though they also pair with +most other types of barriers, albeit without transitivity. An acquire +barrier pairs with a release barrier, but both may also pair with other +barriers, including of course general barriers. A write barrier pairs +with a data dependency barrier, an acquire barrier, a release barrier, +a read barrier, or a general barrier. Similarly a read barrier or a +data dependency barrier pairs with a write barrier, an acquire barrier, +a release barrier, or a general barrier: CPU 1 CPU 2 =============== ===============