From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:28:35 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: bpf: add various tests around spill/fill of regs
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1a776b9ce82d2df9c7ba140588a49721ffb0dc8f;p=linux-beck.git

bpf: add various tests around spill/fill of regs

Add several spill/fill tests. Besides others, one that performs xadd
on the spilled register, one ldx/stx test where different types are
spilled from two branches and read out from common path. Verfier does
handle all correctly.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---

diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 369ffaad3799..45cf74017ac9 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <linux/unistd.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_perf_event.h>
 #include <stddef.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <sys/resource.h>
@@ -1127,6 +1128,108 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of ctx",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of ctx 2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_hash_recalc),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of ctx 3",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_hash_recalc),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R1 type=fp expected=ctx",
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of ctx 4",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_hash_recalc),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx",
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of different pointers stx",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 42),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -16),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different pointers",
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill of different pointers ldx",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2,
+				      -(__s32)offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data,
+						       sample_period) - 8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct bpf_perf_event_data,
+					     sample_period)),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.errstr = "same insn cannot be used with different pointers",
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT,
+	},
 	{
 		"unpriv: write pointer into map elem value",
 		.insns = {
@@ -1193,6 +1296,19 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.errstr = "frame pointer is read only",
 		.result = REJECT,
 	},
+	{
+		"unpriv: spill/fill frame pointer",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_6, -8),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_10, 0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_6, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "frame pointer is read only",
+		.result = REJECT,
+	},
 	{
 		"unpriv: cmp of frame pointer",
 		.insns = {