From: Yongqiang Yang Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:46:46 +0000 (-0500) Subject: jbd2: clear revoked flag on buffers before a new transaction started X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=1ba37268cd19e5a2a80924bfe8618bf1ba3e8249;p=linux-beck.git jbd2: clear revoked flag on buffers before a new transaction started Currently, we clear revoked flag only when a block is reused. However, this can tigger a false journal error. Consider a situation when a block is used as a meta block and is deleted(revoked) in ordered mode, then the block is allocated as a data block to a file. At this moment, user changes the file's journal mode from ordered to journaled and truncates the file. The block will be considered re-revoked by journal because it has revoked flag still pending from the last transaction and an assertion triggers. We fix the problem by keeping the revoked status more uptodate - we clear revoked flag when switching revoke tables to reflect there is no revoked buffers in current transaction any more. Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Yang Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" --- diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c index 68d704db787f..5069b8475150 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c @@ -429,6 +429,12 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal) jbd_debug(3, "JBD2: commit phase 1\n"); + /* + * Clear revoked flag to reflect there is no revoked buffers + * in the next transaction which is going to be started. + */ + jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal); + /* * Switch to a new revoke table. */ diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c index 69fd93588118..30b2867d6cc9 100644 --- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c +++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ * overwriting the new data. We don't even need to clear the revoke * bit here. * + * We cache revoke status of a buffer in the current transaction in b_states + * bits. As the name says, revokevalid flag indicates that the cached revoke + * status of a buffer is valid and we can rely on the cached status. + * * Revoke information on buffers is a tri-state value: * * RevokeValid clear: no cached revoke status, need to look it up @@ -478,6 +482,36 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh) return did_revoke; } +/* + * journal_clear_revoked_flag clears revoked flag of buffers in + * revoke table to reflect there is no revoked buffers in the next + * transaction which is going to be started. + */ +void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal) +{ + struct jbd2_revoke_table_s *revoke = journal->j_revoke; + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < revoke->hash_size; i++) { + struct list_head *hash_list; + struct list_head *list_entry; + hash_list = &revoke->hash_table[i]; + + list_for_each(list_entry, hash_list) { + struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record; + struct buffer_head *bh; + record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry; + bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev, + record->blocknr, + journal->j_blocksize); + if (bh) { + clear_buffer_revoked(bh); + __brelse(bh); + } + } + } +} + /* journal_switch_revoke table select j_revoke for next transaction * we do not want to suspend any processing until all revokes are * written -bzzz diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h index 2092ea21e469..5557baefed60 100644 --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h @@ -1151,6 +1151,7 @@ extern int jbd2_journal_set_revoke(journal_t *, unsigned long long, tid_t); extern int jbd2_journal_test_revoke(journal_t *, unsigned long long, tid_t); extern void jbd2_journal_clear_revoke(journal_t *); extern void jbd2_journal_switch_revoke_table(journal_t *journal); +extern void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal); /* * The log thread user interface: