From: Yuan Mu Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:44:21 +0000 (-0800) Subject: [PATCH] hwmon: Fix missing boundary check when setting W83627THF in0 limits X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2723ab91cb4019def10bdb01b0fecb85e6ac7884;p=linux-beck.git [PATCH] hwmon: Fix missing boundary check when setting W83627THF in0 limits Add SENSORS_LIMIT in store VCore limit functions. This fixes a potential u8 overflow on out-of-range user input. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/w83627hf.c b/drivers/hwmon/w83627hf.c index 4e9a04e1f08e..bbb3dcde146b 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/w83627hf.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/w83627hf.c @@ -456,7 +456,9 @@ static ssize_t store_regs_in_min0(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a (w83627thf == data->type || w83637hf == data->type)) /* use VRM9 calculation */ - data->in_min[0] = (u8)(((val * 100) - 70000 + 244) / 488); + data->in_min[0] = + SENSORS_LIMIT(((val * 100) - 70000 + 244) / 488, 0, + 255); else /* use VRM8 (standard) calculation */ data->in_min[0] = IN_TO_REG(val); @@ -481,7 +483,9 @@ static ssize_t store_regs_in_max0(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *a (w83627thf == data->type || w83637hf == data->type)) /* use VRM9 calculation */ - data->in_max[0] = (u8)(((val * 100) - 70000 + 244) / 488); + data->in_max[0] = + SENSORS_LIMIT(((val * 100) - 70000 + 244) / 488, 0, + 255); else /* use VRM8 (standard) calculation */ data->in_max[0] = IN_TO_REG(val);