From: Christian Ehrhardt Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:24:54 +0000 (+0100) Subject: [S390] fix dfp elf hwcap/facility bit detection X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2ac3307f275c2a91af0417e16d2cfb95ae478661;p=linux-beck.git [S390] fix dfp elf hwcap/facility bit detection The old dfp detection wanted to check bit 43 (dfp high performance), but due to a wrong calculation always used to check bit 42. Additionally the "userspace expectation" is, that the dfp capability bit is set is if facility bit 42 (decimal floating point facility available) and bit 44 (perform floating point operation facility avail). The patch fixes the bit calculation and extends the check to work like: elf hw cap dfp bit = facility bits 42 (dfp) & 44 (pfpo) available Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c index 580abb53ce83..18222ac4078f 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c @@ -713,13 +713,15 @@ static void __init setup_hwcaps(void) * How many facility words are stored depends on the number of * doublewords passed to the instruction. The additional facilites * are: - * Bit 43: decimal floating point facility is installed + * Bit 42: decimal floating point facility is installed + * Bit 44: perform floating point operation facility is installed * translated to: * HWCAP_S390_DFP bit 6. */ if ((elf_hwcap & (1UL << 2)) && __stfle(&facility_list_extended, 1) > 0) { - if (facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (64 - 43))) + if ((facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (63 - 42))) + && (facility_list_extended & (1ULL << (63 - 44)))) elf_hwcap |= 1UL << 6; }