From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:21:37 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: irq: clean up manage.c
X-Git-Tag: v2.6.30-rc1~3^2~9^2~16
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=327ec5699c29454322d0136375f717f509c145b6;p=karo-tx-linux.git

irq: clean up manage.c

- make printk message git-greppable
- fix a few style details

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 1c5055069170..8f4bc61f0df9 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ int __irq_set_trigger(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq,
  * allocate special interrupts that are part of the architecture.
  */
 static int
-__setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc * desc, struct irqaction *new)
+__setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
 {
 	struct irqaction *old, **p;
 	const char *old_name = NULL;
@@ -687,11 +687,12 @@ int request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
 	 * the behavior is classified as "will not fix" so we need to
 	 * start nudging drivers away from using that idiom.
 	 */
-	if ((irqflags & (IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED))
-			== (IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED))
-		pr_warning("IRQ %d/%s: IRQF_DISABLED is not "
-				"guaranteed on shared IRQs\n",
-				irq, devname);
+	if ((irqflags & (IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED)) ==
+					(IRQF_SHARED|IRQF_DISABLED)) {
+		pr_warning(
+		  "IRQ %d/%s: IRQF_DISABLED is not guaranteed on shared IRQs\n",
+			irq, devname);
+	}
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
 	/*