From: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:52:55 +0000 (+0530)
Subject: sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3436ae1298cb22d722a6520fc97f112dd767a9e1;p=linux-beck.git

sched: Fix rebalance interval calculation

The interval for checking scheduling domains if they are due to be
balanced currently depends on boot state NR_CPUS, which may not
accurately reflect the number of online CPUs at the time of check.

Thus replace NR_CPUS with num_online_cpus().

 (ed: Should only affect those who set NR_CPUS really high, such as 4096
      or so :-)

Signed-off-by: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <AANLkTikqHWid2Q93F5U5Qw5snJH8C5PXoa7J6=6hYO94@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---

diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 3f7ec9e27ee1..c7ec5c8e7b44 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/latencytop.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
 
 /*
  * Targeted preemption latency for CPU-bound tasks:
@@ -3850,8 +3851,8 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 		interval = msecs_to_jiffies(interval);
 		if (unlikely(!interval))
 			interval = 1;
-		if (interval > HZ*NR_CPUS/10)
-			interval = HZ*NR_CPUS/10;
+		if (interval > HZ*num_online_cpus()/10)
+			interval = HZ*num_online_cpus()/10;
 
 		need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;