From: Ying Xue Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:00:27 +0000 (+0800) Subject: tipc: any name table member must be protected under name table lock X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3493d25cfb5eee9d0045c2720878a26dcbeafa73;p=linux-beck.git tipc: any name table member must be protected under name table lock As tipc_nametbl_lock is used to protect name_table structure, the lock must be held while all members of name_table structure are accessed. However, the lock is not obtained while a member of name_table structure - local_publ_count is read in tipc_nametbl_publish(), as a consequence, an inconsistent value of local_publ_count might be got. Signed-off-by: Ying Xue Reviewed-by: Erik Hugne Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy Tested-by: Erik Hugne Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/net/tipc/name_table.c b/net/tipc/name_table.c index 0d61f5826407..93bac40292c1 100644 --- a/net/tipc/name_table.c +++ b/net/tipc/name_table.c @@ -656,13 +656,14 @@ struct publication *tipc_nametbl_publish(u32 type, u32 lower, u32 upper, struct publication *publ; struct sk_buff *buf = NULL; + write_lock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock); if (tipc_nametbl->local_publ_count >= TIPC_MAX_PUBLICATIONS) { pr_warn("Publication failed, local publication limit reached (%u)\n", TIPC_MAX_PUBLICATIONS); + write_unlock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock); return NULL; } - write_lock_bh(&tipc_nametbl_lock); publ = tipc_nametbl_insert_publ(type, lower, upper, scope, tipc_own_addr, port_ref, key); if (likely(publ)) {