From: Tejun Heo Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:58:48 +0000 (+0900) Subject: [PATCH] libata: make new reset act identical to ->phy_reset register-wise X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3a39746a5290445ea4238f21ac260e42106c1454;p=linux-beck.git [PATCH] libata: make new reset act identical to ->phy_reset register-wise This patch makes std component operations act identical to ->phy_reset register-wise except for SError clearing on sata_std_hardreset. Note that if a driver only implements/uses hardreset, it should not use ata_std_probeinit() to avoid extra sata_phy_resume() and ata_busy_sleep() compared to ->phy_reset. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik --- diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c index b938c7a37664..8424bd9ee26d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c @@ -1924,11 +1924,20 @@ static int sata_phy_resume(struct ata_port *ap) * * @ap is about to be probed. Initialize it. This function is * to be used as standard callback for ata_drive_probe_reset(). + * + * NOTE!!! Do not use this function as probeinit if a low level + * driver implements only hardreset. Just pass NULL as probeinit + * in that case. Using this function is probably okay but doing + * so makes reset sequence different from the original + * ->phy_reset implementation and Jeff nervous. :-P */ extern void ata_std_probeinit(struct ata_port *ap) { - if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_SATA && ap->ops->scr_read) + if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_SATA && ap->ops->scr_read) { sata_phy_resume(ap); + if (sata_dev_present(ap)) + ata_busy_sleep(ap, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT_QUICK, ATA_TMOUT_BOOT); + } } /** @@ -1954,20 +1963,17 @@ int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose, unsigned int *classes) DPRINTK("ENTER\n"); + if (ap->ops->scr_read && !sata_dev_present(ap)) { + classes[0] = ATA_DEV_NONE; + goto out; + } + /* determine if device 0/1 are present */ if (ata_devchk(ap, 0)) devmask |= (1 << 0); if (slave_possible && ata_devchk(ap, 1)) devmask |= (1 << 1); - /* devchk reports device presence without actual device on - * most SATA controllers. Check SStatus and turn devmask off - * if link is offline. Note that we should continue resetting - * even when it seems like there's no device. - */ - if (ap->ops->scr_read && !sata_dev_present(ap)) - devmask = 0; - /* select device 0 again */ ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0); @@ -1989,6 +1995,7 @@ int ata_std_softreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose, unsigned int *classes) if (slave_possible && err != 0x81) classes[1] = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 1, &err); + out: DPRINTK("EXIT, classes[0]=%u [1]=%u\n", classes[0], classes[1]); return 0; } @@ -2047,6 +2054,8 @@ int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_port *ap, int verbose, unsigned int *class) return -EIO; } + ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0); /* probably unnecessary */ + *class = ata_dev_try_classify(ap, 0, NULL); DPRINTK("EXIT, class=%u\n", *class); @@ -2081,11 +2090,9 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes) if (ap->cbl == ATA_CBL_SATA) sata_print_link_status(ap); - /* bail out if no device is present */ - if (classes[0] == ATA_DEV_NONE && classes[1] == ATA_DEV_NONE) { - DPRINTK("EXIT, no device\n"); - return; - } + /* re-enable interrupts */ + if (ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr) /* FIXME: hack. create a hook instead */ + ata_irq_on(ap); /* is double-select really necessary? */ if (classes[0] != ATA_DEV_NONE) @@ -2093,9 +2100,19 @@ void ata_std_postreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *classes) if (classes[1] != ATA_DEV_NONE) ap->ops->dev_select(ap, 0); - /* re-enable interrupts & set up device control */ - if (ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr) /* FIXME: hack. create a hook instead */ - ata_irq_on(ap); + /* bail out if no device is present */ + if (classes[0] == ATA_DEV_NONE && classes[1] == ATA_DEV_NONE) { + DPRINTK("EXIT, no device\n"); + return; + } + + /* set up device control */ + if (ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr) { + if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_MMIO) + writeb(ap->ctl, (void __iomem *) ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr); + else + outb(ap->ctl, ap->ioaddr.ctl_addr); + } DPRINTK("EXIT\n"); }