From: Wengang Wang Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:40:44 +0000 (+0800) Subject: ocfs2: Check the owner of a lockres inside the spinlock X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=428257f8870f0e72e85ce782d091fa1f366de7df;p=mv-sheeva.git ocfs2: Check the owner of a lockres inside the spinlock The checking of lockres owner in dlm_update_lvb() is not inside spinlock protection. I don't see problem in current call path of dlm_update_lvb(). But just for code robustness. Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang Signed-off-by: Joel Becker --- diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c index dccc439fa08..b7a25ef18e2 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmast.c @@ -185,9 +185,8 @@ static void dlm_update_lvb(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock_resource *res, BUG_ON(!lksb); /* only updates if this node masters the lockres */ + spin_lock(&res->spinlock); if (res->owner == dlm->node_num) { - - spin_lock(&res->spinlock); /* check the lksb flags for the direction */ if (lksb->flags & DLM_LKSB_GET_LVB) { mlog(0, "getting lvb from lockres for %s node\n", @@ -202,8 +201,8 @@ static void dlm_update_lvb(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, struct dlm_lock_resource *res, * here. In the future we might want to clear it at the time * the put is actually done. */ - spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); } + spin_unlock(&res->spinlock); /* reset any lvb flags on the lksb */ lksb->flags &= ~(DLM_LKSB_PUT_LVB|DLM_LKSB_GET_LVB);