From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:30:03 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: workqueue: drop WQ_RESCUER and test workqueue->rescuer for NULL instead
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=493008a8e475771a2126e0ce95a73e35b371d277;p=linux-beck.git

workqueue: drop WQ_RESCUER and test workqueue->rescuer for NULL instead

WQ_RESCUER is superflous.  WQ_MEM_RECLAIM indicates that the user
wants a rescuer and testing wq->rescuer for NULL can answer whether a
given workqueue has a rescuer or not.  Drop WQ_RESCUER and test
wq->rescuer directly.

This will help simplifying __alloc_workqueue_key() failure path by
allowing it to use destroy_workqueue() on a partially constructed
workqueue, which in turn will help implementing dynamic management of
pool_workqueues.

While at it, clear wq->rescuer after freeing it in
destroy_workqueue().  This is a precaution as scheduled changes will
make destruction more complex.

This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 00c1b9ba8252..c270b4eedf16 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ enum {
 	WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE	= 1 << 5, /* cpu instensive workqueue */
 
 	WQ_DRAINING		= 1 << 6, /* internal: workqueue is draining */
-	WQ_RESCUER		= 1 << 7, /* internal: workqueue has rescuer */
 
 	WQ_MAX_ACTIVE		= 512,	  /* I like 512, better ideas? */
 	WQ_MAX_UNBOUND_PER_CPU	= 4,	  /* 4 * #cpus for unbound wq */
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a8b86f7b6e34..7ff2b9c5cc3a 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1827,7 +1827,7 @@ static void send_mayday(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&workqueue_lock);
 
-	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_RESCUER))
+	if (!wq->rescuer)
 		return;
 
 	/* mayday mayday mayday */
@@ -2285,7 +2285,7 @@ sleep:
  * @__rescuer: self
  *
  * Workqueue rescuer thread function.  There's one rescuer for each
- * workqueue which has WQ_RESCUER set.
+ * workqueue which has WQ_MEM_RECLAIM set.
  *
  * Regular work processing on a pool may block trying to create a new
  * worker which uses GFP_KERNEL allocation which has slight chance of
@@ -2769,7 +2769,7 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr)
 	 * flusher is not running on the same workqueue by verifying write
 	 * access.
 	 */
-	if (pwq->wq->saved_max_active == 1 || pwq->wq->flags & WQ_RESCUER)
+	if (pwq->wq->saved_max_active == 1 || pwq->wq->rescuer)
 		lock_map_acquire(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
 	else
 		lock_map_acquire_read(&pwq->wq->lockdep_map);
@@ -3412,13 +3412,6 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
 	va_end(args);
 	va_end(args1);
 
-	/*
-	 * Workqueues which may be used during memory reclaim should
-	 * have a rescuer to guarantee forward progress.
-	 */
-	if (flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM)
-		flags |= WQ_RESCUER;
-
 	max_active = max_active ?: WQ_DFL_ACTIVE;
 	max_active = wq_clamp_max_active(max_active, flags, wq->name);
 
@@ -3449,7 +3442,11 @@ struct workqueue_struct *__alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt,
 	}
 	local_irq_enable();
 
-	if (flags & WQ_RESCUER) {
+	/*
+	 * Workqueues which may be used during memory reclaim should
+	 * have a rescuer to guarantee forward progress.
+	 */
+	if (flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM) {
 		struct worker *rescuer;
 
 		wq->rescuer = rescuer = alloc_worker();
@@ -3533,9 +3530,10 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock);
 
-	if (wq->flags & WQ_RESCUER) {
+	if (wq->rescuer) {
 		kthread_stop(wq->rescuer->task);
 		kfree(wq->rescuer);
+		wq->rescuer = NULL;
 	}
 
 	/*