From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 02:56:08 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: perf/x86/intel: Re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b854900995194601d767fcd112307b21ed278b2;p=linux-beck.git

perf/x86/intel: Re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS

Make later patch more readable, no logic change.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: eranian@google.com
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1415156173-10035-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 8ffd71ec2173..e0dab5ce61e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -399,36 +399,35 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 
 		if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		/*
-		 * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
-		 * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
-		 */
-		if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 &&
-		    x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
-			u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
-
-			if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
-				if (!precise_br_compat(event))
-					return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-				/* branch_sample_type is compatible */
-
-			} else {
-				/*
-				 * user did not specify  branch_sample_type
-				 *
-				 * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
-				 * the branches at the priv level of the
-				 * event.
-				 */
-				*br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
-
-				if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
-					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
-
-				if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
-					*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
-			}
+	}
+	/*
+	 * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with
+	 * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type
+	 */
+	if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) {
+		u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type;
+
+		if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
+			if (!precise_br_compat(event))
+				return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+			/* branch_sample_type is compatible */
+
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * user did not specify  branch_sample_type
+			 *
+			 * For PEBS fixups, we capture all
+			 * the branches at the priv level of the
+			 * event.
+			 */
+			*br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY;
+
+			if (!event->attr.exclude_user)
+				*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER;
+
+			if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel)
+				*br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL;
 		}
 	}