From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:40:54 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: OpenRISC: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4ca159f725e46462fbad64c928437a6651f6405b;p=linux-beck.git

OpenRISC: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()

Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call
it. This also fixes a bug because we were modifying ka->sa.sa_handler
(which is a copy of sighand->action[]), whereas the intention of the
code was to modify sighand->action[] directly.

As the original code was working with a copy it had no effect on
signal delivery.

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux@lists.openrisc.net
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
---

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
index 95207ab0c99e..53741ba0210e 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -250,9 +250,7 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
 	return;
 
 give_sigsegv:
-	if (sig == SIGSEGV)
-		ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-	force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
+	force_sigsegv(sig, current);
 }
 
 static inline void