From: Peter Ujfalusi Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 13:26:31 +0000 (+0300) Subject: ASoC: twl6040: No need to change delay during HF ramp X-Git-Url: https://git.karo-electronics.de/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4d64bdca4485da8d2e604c2b02f3f32c9f468a28;p=linux-beck.git ASoC: twl6040: No need to change delay during HF ramp The Handsfree gain have 2dB steps all the way, so there is no reason to have different delays as we approaching to the end of the scale. The comment was also wrong, since we have 0dB at 0x3 raw, at 16 the gain is -26dB. Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c index 0144e435c08b..c973347d4f6b 100644 --- a/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/twl6040.c @@ -526,7 +526,6 @@ static void twl6040_pga_hf_work(struct work_struct *work) container_of(work, struct twl6040_data, handsfree.work.work); struct snd_soc_codec *codec = priv->codec; struct twl6040_output *handsfree = &priv->handsfree; - unsigned int delay = handsfree->step_delay; int i, handsfree_complete; /* do we need to ramp at all ? */ @@ -543,15 +542,8 @@ static void twl6040_pga_hf_work(struct work_struct *work) if (handsfree_complete) break; - /* - * TODO: tune: delay is longer over 0dB - * as increases are larger. - */ - if (i >= 16) - schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(delay + - (delay >> 1))); - else - schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(delay)); + schedule_timeout_interruptible( + msecs_to_jiffies(handsfree->step_delay)); }